Product Comparison

Fast Films versus SPS 2000

You have to ask yourself why SPS wins so many more awards than Fast Films for it's users?

Screenprint Separator dominates Fast Films in head to head comparison.

see April Issue of " the Press" magazine " Tri-seps."

Lon and Don of the PRESS MAGAZINE HAD THIS TO SAY ABOUT FAST FILMS

"We couldn't get this thing to come together no matter what we did"

"I tried Fast Films on about 20 jobs - not print one matched the original.

I upgraded to SPS and the last 25 jobs matched the original exactly.

Why would you use anything else."

Colin Mitchell -separator - art director.

Instead of becoming overwhelmed by all the hype, it is really quite easy to compare one separation package with another.

The easiest way to prove that one system is superior to another, is to take the same image and separate it using both programs

and then compare the printed result. Here we see the original image , the same image printed with Screenprint Separator 2000 and the final image below

was separated and printed using Fast Films for the 1999 SGIA show.

The two comparison images were scanned directly from the shirt.

Because Fast Films is a pale copy of Color Crunch and Spot Process you can expect a slightly better image than the Fast Films image if you use those programs.

The original image

Printed shirt using Screenprint Separator

don't do this to cowboys........

Above is the printed shirt using Fast Films from the USScreen institute.

you can see why we don't loose any sleep worrying about the competition.

We didn't become number one by selling pure misery.

Have you ever tried charging for a moire?

IF YOU WISH TO LEARN MORE ABOUT FAST FILMS AND THE COMPETITION FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW

"no wonder Scott Fresener no longer teaches Screen printing and is now pushing inkjet prints"

Copyright Screenprint Separator 2006